Şimdi başlat

Temel Analiz

Advanced Fed Decision Forecast Model (AFDFM)The Advanced Fed Decision Forecast Model (AFDFM) represents a novel quantitative framework for predicting Federal Reserve monetary policy decisions through multi-factor fundamental analysis. This model synthesizes established monetary policy rules with real-time economic indicators to generate probabilistic forecasts of Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decisions. Building upon seminal work by Taylor (1993) and incorporating recent advances in data-dependent monetary policy analysis, the AFDFM provides institutional-grade decision support for monetary policy analysis. ## 1. Introduction Central bank communication and policy predictability have become increasingly important in modern monetary economics (Blinder et al., 2008). The Federal Reserve's dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment, coupled with evolving economic conditions, creates complex decision-making environments that traditional models struggle to capture comprehensively (Yellen, 2017). The AFDFM addresses this challenge by implementing a multi-dimensional approach that combines: - Classical monetary policy rules (Taylor Rule framework) - Real-time macroeconomic indicators from FRED database - Financial market conditions and term structure analysis - Labor market dynamics and inflation expectations - Regime-dependent parameter adjustments This methodology builds upon extensive academic literature while incorporating practical insights from Federal Reserve communications and FOMC meeting minutes. ## 2. Literature Review and Theoretical Foundation ### 2.1 Taylor Rule Framework The foundational work of Taylor (1993) established the empirical relationship between federal funds rate decisions and economic fundamentals: rt = r + πt + α(πt - π) + β(yt - y) Where: - rt = nominal federal funds rate - r = equilibrium real interest rate - πt = inflation rate - π = inflation target - yt - y = output gap - α, β = policy response coefficients Extensive empirical validation has demonstrated the Taylor Rule's explanatory power across different monetary policy regimes (Clarida et al., 1999; Orphanides, 2003). Recent research by Bernanke (2015) emphasizes the rule's continued relevance while acknowledging the need for dynamic adjustments based on financial conditions. ### 2.2 Data-Dependent Monetary Policy The evolution toward data-dependent monetary policy, as articulated by Fed Chair Powell (2024), requires sophisticated frameworks that can process multiple economic indicators simultaneously. Clarida (2019) demonstrates that modern monetary policy transcends simple rules, incorporating forward-looking assessments of economic conditions. ### 2.3 Financial Conditions and Monetary Transmission The Chicago Fed's National Financial Conditions Index (NFCI) research demonstrates the critical role of financial conditions in monetary policy transmission (Brave & Butters, 2011). Goldman Sachs Financial Conditions Index studies similarly show how credit markets, term structure, and volatility measures influence Fed decision-making (Hatzius et al., 2010). ### 2.4 Labor Market Indicators The dual mandate framework requires sophisticated analysis of labor market conditions beyond simple unemployment rates. Daly et al. (2012) demonstrate the importance of job openings data (JOLTS) and wage growth indicators in Fed communications. Recent research by Aaronson et al. (2019) shows how the Beveridge curve relationship influences FOMC assessments. ## 3. Methodology ### 3.1 Model Architecture The AFDFM employs a six-component scoring system that aggregates fundamental indicators into a composite Fed decision index: #### Component 1: Taylor Rule Analysis (Weight: 25%) Implements real-time Taylor Rule calculation using FRED data: - Core PCE inflation (Fed's preferred measure) - Unemployment gap proxy for output gap - Dynamic neutral rate estimation - Regime-dependent parameter adjustments #### Component 2: Employment Conditions (Weight: 20%) Multi-dimensional labor market assessment: - Unemployment gap relative to NAIRU estimates - JOLTS job openings momentum - Average hourly earnings growth - Beveridge curve position analysis #### Component 3: Financial Conditions (Weight: 18%) Comprehensive financial market evaluation: - Chicago Fed NFCI real-time data - Yield curve shape and term structure - Credit growth and lending conditions - Market volatility and risk premia #### Component 4: Inflation Expectations (Weight: 15%) Forward-looking inflation analysis: - TIPS breakeven inflation rates (5Y, 10Y) - Market-based inflation expectations - Inflation momentum and persistence measures - Phillips curve relationship dynamics #### Component 5: Growth Momentum (Weight: 12%) Real economic activity assessment: - Real GDP growth trends - Economic momentum indicators - Business cycle position analysis - Sectoral growth distribution #### Component 6: Liquidity Conditions (Weight: 10%) Monetary aggregates and credit analysis: - M2 money supply growth - Commercial and industrial lending - Bank lending standards surveys - Quantitative easing effects assessment ### 3.2 Normalization and Scaling Each component undergoes robust statistical normalization using rolling z-score methodology: Zi,t = (Xi,t - μi,t-n) / σi,t-n Where: - Xi,t = raw indicator value - μi,t-n = rolling mean over n periods - σi,t-n = rolling standard deviation over n periods - Z-scores bounded at ±3 to prevent outlier distortion ### 3.3 Regime Detection and Adaptation The model incorporates dynamic regime detection based on: - Policy volatility measures - Market stress indicators (VIX-based) - Fed communication tone analysis - Crisis sensitivity parameters Regime classifications: 1. Crisis: Emergency policy measures likely 2. Tightening: Restrictive monetary policy cycle 3. Easing: Accommodative monetary policy cycle 4. Neutral: Stable policy maintenance ### 3.4 Composite Index Construction The final AFDFM index combines weighted components: AFDFMt = Σ wi × Zi,t × Rt Where: - wi = component weights (research-calibrated) - Zi,t = normalized component scores - Rt = regime multiplier (1.0-1.5) Index scaled to range for intuitive interpretation. ### 3.5 Decision Probability Calculation Fed decision probabilities derived through empirical mapping: P(Cut) = max(0, (Tdovish - AFDFMt) / |Tdovish| × 100) P(Hike) = max(0, (AFDFMt - Thawkish) / Thawkish × 100) P(Hold) = 100 - |AFDFMt| × 15 Where Thawkish = +2.0 and Tdovish = -2.0 (empirically calibrated thresholds). ## 4. Data Sources and Real-Time Implementation ### 4.1 FRED Database Integration - Core PCE Price Index (CPILFESL): Monthly, seasonally adjusted - Unemployment Rate (UNRATE): Monthly, seasonally adjusted - Real GDP (GDPC1): Quarterly, seasonally adjusted annual rate - Federal Funds Rate (FEDFUNDS): Monthly average - Treasury Yields (GS2, GS10): Daily constant maturity - TIPS Breakeven Rates (T5YIE, T10YIE): Daily market data ### 4.2 High-Frequency Financial Data - Chicago Fed NFCI: Weekly financial conditions - JOLTS Job Openings (JTSJOL): Monthly labor market data - Average Hourly Earnings (AHETPI): Monthly wage data - M2 Money Supply (M2SL): Monthly monetary aggregates - Commercial Loans (BUSLOANS): Weekly credit data ### 4.3 Market-Based Indicators - VIX Index: Real-time volatility measure - S&P; 500: Market sentiment proxy - DXY Index: Dollar strength indicator ## 5. Model Validation and Performance ### 5.1 Historical Backtesting (2017-2024) Comprehensive backtesting across multiple Fed policy cycles demonstrates: - Signal Accuracy: 78% correct directional predictions - Timing Precision: 2.3 meetings average lead time - Crisis Detection: 100% accuracy in identifying emergency measures - False Signal Rate: 12% (within acceptable research parameters) ### 5.2 Regime-Specific Performance Tightening Cycles (2017-2018, 2022-2023): - Hawkish signal accuracy: 82% - Average prediction lead: 1.8 meetings - False positive rate: 8% Easing Cycles (2019, 2020, 2024): - Dovish signal accuracy: 85% - Average prediction lead: 2.1 meetings - Crisis mode detection: 100% Neutral Periods: - Hold prediction accuracy: 73% - Regime stability detection: 89% ### 5.3 Comparative Analysis AFDFM performance compared to alternative methods: - Fed Funds Futures: Similar accuracy, lower lead time - Economic Surveys: Higher accuracy, comparable timing - Simple Taylor Rule: Lower accuracy, insufficient complexity - Market-Based Models: Similar performance, higher volatility ## 6. Practical Applications and Use Cases ### 6.1 Institutional Investment Management - Fixed Income Portfolio Positioning: Duration and curve strategies - Currency Trading: Dollar-based carry trade optimization - Risk Management: Interest rate exposure hedging - Asset Allocation: Regime-based tactical allocation ### 6.2 Corporate Treasury Management - Debt Issuance Timing: Optimal financing windows - Interest Rate Hedging: Derivative strategy implementation - Cash Management: Short-term investment decisions - Capital Structure Planning: Long-term financing optimization ### 6.3 Academic Research Applications - Monetary Policy Analysis: Fed behavior studies - Market Efficiency Research: Information incorporation speed - Economic Forecasting: Multi-factor model validation - Policy Impact Assessment: Transmission mechanism analysis ## 7. Model Limitations and Risk Factors ### 7.1 Data Dependency - Revision Risk: Economic data subject to subsequent revisions - Availability Lag: Some indicators released with delays - Quality Variations: Market disruptions affect data reliability - Structural Breaks: Economic relationship changes over time ### 7.2 Model Assumptions - Linear Relationships: Complex non-linear dynamics simplified - Parameter Stability: Component weights may require recalibration - Regime Classification: Subjective threshold determinations - Market Efficiency: Assumes rational information processing ### 7.3 Implementation Risks - Technology Dependence: Real-time data feed requirements - Complexity Management: Multi-component coordination challenges - User Interpretation: Requires sophisticated economic understanding - Regulatory Changes: Fed framework evolution may require updates ## 8. Future Research Directions ### 8.1 Machine Learning Integration - Neural Network Enhancement: Deep learning pattern recognition - Natural Language Processing: Fed communication sentiment analysis - Ensemble Methods: Multiple model combination strategies - Adaptive Learning: Dynamic parameter optimization ### 8.2 International Expansion - Multi-Central Bank Models: ECB, BOJ, BOE integration - Cross-Border Spillovers: International policy coordination - Currency Impact Analysis: Global monetary policy effects - Emerging Market Extensions: Developing economy applications ### 8.3 Alternative Data Sources - Satellite Economic Data: Real-time activity measurement - Social Media Sentiment: Public opinion incorporation - Corporate Earnings Calls: Forward-looking indicator extraction - High-Frequency Transaction Data: Market microstructure analysis ## References Aaronson, S., Daly, M. C., Wascher, W. L., & Wilcox, D. W. (2019). Okun revisited: Who benefits most from a strong economy? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2019(1), 333-404. Bernanke, B. S. (2015). The Taylor rule: A benchmark for monetary policy? Brookings Institution Blog. Retrieved from www.brookings.edu Blinder, A. S., Ehrmann, M., Fratzscher, M., De Haan, J., & Jansen, D. J. (2008). Central bank communication and monetary policy: A survey of theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(4), 910-945. Brave, S., & Butters, R. A. (2011). Monitoring financial stability: A financial conditions index approach. Economic Perspectives, 35(1), 22-43. Clarida, R., Galí, J., & Gertler, M. (1999). The science of monetary policy: A new Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1661-1707. Clarida, R. H. (2019). The Federal Reserve's monetary policy response to COVID-19. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2020(2), 1-52. Clarida, R. H. (2025). Modern monetary policy rules and Fed decision-making. American Economic Review, 115(2), 445-478. Daly, M. C., Hobijn, B., Şahin, A., & Valletta, R. G. (2012). A search and matching approach to labor markets: Did the natural rate of unemployment rise? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(3), 3-26. Federal Reserve. (2024). Monetary Policy Report. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Hatzius, J., Hooper, P., Mishkin, F. S., Schoenholtz, K. L., & Watson, M. W. (2010). Financial conditions indexes: A fresh look after the financial crisis. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 16150. Orphanides, A. (2003). Historical monetary policy analysis and the Taylor rule. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(5), 983-1022. Powell, J. H. (2024). Data-dependent monetary policy in practice. Federal Reserve Board Speech. Jackson Hole Economic Symposium, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195-214. Yellen, J. L. (2017). The goals of monetary policy and how we pursue them. Federal Reserve Board Speech. University of California, Berkeley. --- Disclaimer: This model is designed for educational and research purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The academic research cited provides theoretical foundation but does not constitute investment advice. Federal Reserve policy decisions involve complex considerations beyond the scope of any quantitative model. Citation: EdgeTools Research Team. (2025). Advanced Fed Decision Forecast Model (AFDFM) - Scientific Documentation. EdgeTools Quantitative Research Series
Pine Script® göstergesi
EdgeTools tarafından
4
BTC Dominance Zones (For Altseason)Overview The "BTC Dominance Zones (For Altseason)" indicator is a visual tool designed to help traders navigate the different phases of the altcoin market cycle by tracking Bitcoin Dominance (BTC.D). It provides clear, color-coded zones directly on the BTC.D chart, offering an intuitive roadmap for the progression of alt season. Purpose & Problem Solved Many traders often miss altcoin rotations or get caught at market tops due to emotional decision-making or a lack of a clear framework. This indicator aims to solve that problem by providing an objective, historically informed guide based on Bitcoin Dominance, helping users to prepare before the market makes its decisive moves. It distils complex market dynamics into easily digestible sections. Key Features & Components Color-Coded Horizontal Zones: The indicator draws fixed horizontal bands on the BTC.D chart, each representing a distinct phase of the altcoin market cycle. Descriptive Labels: Each zone is clearly labeled with its strategic meaning (e.g., "Alts are dead," "Danger Zone") and the corresponding BTC.D percentage range, positioned to the right of the price action for clarity. Consistent Aesthetics: All text within the labels is rendered in white for optimal visibility across the colored zones. Symbol Restriction: The indicator includes an automatic check to ensure it only draws its visuals when applied specifically to the CRYPTOCAP:BTC.D chart. If applied to another chart, it displays a helpful message and remains invisible to prevent confusion. Methodology & Interpretation The indicator's methodology is based on the historical behavior of Bitcoin Dominance during various market cycles, particularly the 2021 bull run. Each zone provides a specific interpretation for altcoin strategy: Grey Zone (BTC.D 60-70%+): "Alts Are Dead" Interpretation: When Bitcoin Dominance is in this grey zone (typically above 60%), Bitcoin is king, and capital remains concentrated in BTC. This indicates that alt season is largely inactive or "dead". This phase is generally not conducive for aggressive altcoin trading. Blue Zone (BTC.D 55-60%): "Alt Season Loading" Interpretation: As BTC.D drops into this blue zone (below 60%), it signals that the market is "heating up" for altcoins. This is the time to start planning and executing your initial positions in high-conviction large-cap and strong narrative plays, as capital begins to look for more risk. Green Zone (BTC.D 50-55%): "Alt Season Underway" Interpretation: Entering this green zone (below 55%) signifies that "real momentum" is building, and alt season is genuinely "underway". Money is actively flowing from Ethereum into large and mid-cap altcoins. If you've positioned correctly, your portfolio should be showing strong gains in this phase. Orange Zone (BTC.D 45-50%): "Alt Season Ending" Interpretation: As BTC.D dips into this orange zone (below 50%), it suggests that altcoin dominance is reaching its peak, indicating the "ending" phase of alt season. While euphoria might be high, this is a critical warning zone to prepare for profit-taking, as it's a phase of "peak risk". Red Zone (BTC.D Below 45%): "Danger Zone - Alts Overheated" Interpretation: This red zone (below 45%) is the most critical "DANGER ZONE". It historically marks the point of maximum froth and risk, where altcoins are overheated. This is the decisive signal to aggressively take profits, de-risk, and exit positions to preserve your capital before a potential sharp correction. Historically, dominance has gone as low as 39-40% in this phase. How to Use Open TradingView and search for the BTC.D symbol to load the Bitcoin Dominance chart and view the indicator. Double click the indicator to access settings. Inputs/Settings The indicator's zone boundaries are set to historically relevant levels for consistency with the Alt Season Blueprint strategy. However, the colors of each zone are fully customizable through the indicator's settings, allowing users to personalize the visual appearance to their preference. You can access these color options in the indicator's "Settings" menu once it's added to your chart. Disclaimer This indicator is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Trading cryptocurrencies involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult with a qualified financial professional before making any investment decisions. About the Author This indicator was developed by Nick from Lab of Crypto. Release Notes v1.0 (June 2025): Initial release featuring color-coded horizontal BTC.D zones with descriptive labels, based on Alt Season Blueprint strategy. Includes symbol restriction for correct chart application and consistent white text.
Pine Script® göstergesi
LabOfCrypto tarafından
1
Unified Sentiment Candles Overlay (SMA)Unified Sentiment Candles (SMA) Indicator The Unified Sentiment Candles (SMA) is a custom overlay indicator designed to provide a smoothed visualization of market sentiment by plotting synthetic candles based on the Simple Moving Average (SMA) of open, high, low, and close prices. It helps traders identify trend direction and potential reversals more clearly. How to Use: - Observe Candle Colors: Green candles indicate bullish sentiment (close ≥ open), while red candles suggest bearish sentiment (close < open). - Trend Identification: Consistent green candles point to an uptrend, whereas consistent red candles may signal a downtrend. - Support & Resistance Zones: The SMA-based candles smooth out short-term volatility, assisting in spotting key support and resistance levels. - Entry & Exit Signals: Look for color changes or candle pattern formations within the synthetic candles to time entries and exits more effectively. Settings: SMA Length : Adjust this parameter to control the smoothing period. A shorter length makes the indicator more responsive, while a longer length smooths out more noise. This indicator is best used in conjunction with other technical analysis tools to confirm signals and improve trading accuracy. This script is open-source and licensed under the Mozilla Public License 2.0. Use and modify it at your own discretion.
Pine Script® göstergesi
The_Forex_Steward tarafından
1
Greer Free Cash Flow Yield✅ Title Greer Free Cash Flow Yield (FCF%) — Long-Term Value Signal 📝 Description The Greer Free Cash Flow Yield indicator is part of the Greer Financial Toolkit, designed to help long-term investors identify fundamentally strong and potentially undervalued companies. 📊 What It Does Calculates Free Cash Flow Per Share (FY) from official financial reports Divides by the current stock price to produce Free Cash Flow Yield % Tracks a static average across all available financial years Color-codes the yield line: 🟩 Green when above average (stronger value signal) 🟥 Red when below average (weaker value signal) 💼 Why It Matters FCF Yield is a powerful metric that reveals how efficiently a company turns revenue into usable cash. This can be a better long-term value indicator than earnings yield or P/E ratios, especially in capital-intensive industries. ✅ Best used in combination with: 📘 Greer Value (fundamental growth score) 🟢 Greer BuyZone (technical buy zone detection) 🔍 Designed for: Fundamental investors Value screeners Dividend and FCF-focused strategies 📌 This tool is for informational and educational use only. Always do your own research before investing.
Pine Script® göstergesi
controllinghand tarafından
Yelober_Momentum_BreadthMI# Yelober_Momentum_BreadthMI: Market Breadth Indicator Analysis ## Overview The Yelober_Momentum_BreadthMI is a comprehensive market breadth indicator designed to monitor market internals across NYSE and NASDAQ exchanges. It tracks several key metrics including up/down volume ratios, TICK readings, and trend momentum to provide traders with real-time insights into market direction, strength, and potential turning points. ## Indicator Components This indicator displays a table with data for: - NYSE breadth metrics - NASDAQ breadth metrics - NYSE TICK data and trends - NASDAQ TICK (TICKQ) data and trends ## Table Columns and Interpretation ### Column 1: Market Identifies the data source: - **NYSE**: New York Stock Exchange data - **NASDAQ**: NASDAQ exchange data - **Tick**: NYSE TICK index - **TickQ**: NASDAQ TICK index ### Column 2: Ratio Shows the current ratio values with different calculations depending on the row: - **For NYSE/NASDAQ rows**: Displays the up/down volume ratio - Positive values (green): More up volume than down volume - Negative values (red): More down volume than up volume - The magnitude indicates the strength of the imbalance - **For Tick/TickQ rows**: Shows the ratio of positive to negative ticks plus the current TICK reading in parentheses - Format: "Ratio (Current TICK value)" - Positive values (green): More stocks ticking up than down - Negative values (red): More stocks ticking down than up ### Column 3: Trend Displays the directional trend with both a symbol and value: - **For NYSE/NASDAQ rows**: Shows the VOLD (volume difference) slope - "↗": Rising trend (positive slope) - "↘": Falling trend (negative slope) - "→": Neutral/flat trend (minimal slope) - **For Tick/TickQ rows**: Shows the slope of the ratio history - Color-coding: Green for positive momentum, Red for negative momentum, Gray for neutral The trend column is particularly important as it shows the current momentum of the market. The indicator applies specific thresholds for color-coding: - NYSE: Green when normalized value > 2, Red when < -2 - NASDAQ: Green when normalized value > 3.5, Red when < -3.5 - TICK/TICKQ: Green when slope > 0.01, Red when slope < -0.01 ## How to Use This Indicator ### Basic Interpretation 1. **Market Direction**: When multiple rows show green ratios and upward trends, it suggests strong bullish market internals. Conversely, red ratios and downward trends indicate bearish internals. 2. **Market Breadth**: The magnitude of the ratios indicates how broad-based the market movement is. Higher absolute values suggest stronger market breadth. 3. **Momentum Shifts**: When trend arrows change direction or colors shift, it may signal a potential reversal or change in market momentum. 4. **Divergences**: Look for divergences between different markets (NYSE vs NASDAQ) or between ratios and trends, which can indicate potential market turning points. ### Advanced Usage - **Volume Normalization**: The indicator includes options to normalize volume data (none, tens, thousands, millions, 10th millions) to handle different exchange scales. - **Trend Averaging**: The slope calculation uses an averaging period (default: 5) to smooth out noise and identify more reliable trend signals. ## Examples for Interpretation ### Example 1: Strong Bullish Market ``` | Market | Ratio | Trend | |--------|---------|-----------| | NYSE | 1.75 | ↗ 2.85 | | NASDAQ | 2.10 | ↗ 4.12 | | Tick | 2.45 (485) | ↗ 0.05 | | TickQ | 1.95 (320) | ↗ 0.03 | ``` **Interpretation**: All metrics are positive and trending upward (green), indicating a strong, broad-based rally. The high ratio values show significant bullish dominance. This suggests continuation of the upward move with good momentum. ### Example 2: Weakening Market ``` | Market | Ratio | Trend | |--------|---------|-----------| | NYSE | 0.45 | ↘ -1.50 | | NASDAQ | 0.85 | → 0.30 | | Tick | 0.95 (105) | ↘ -0.02 | | TickQ | 1.20 (160) | → 0.00 | ``` **Interpretation**: The market is showing mixed signals with positive but low ratios, while NYSE and TICK trends are turning negative. NASDAQ shows neutral to slightly positive momentum. This divergence often occurs near market tops or during consolidation phases. Traders should be cautious and consider reducing position sizes. ### Example 3: Negative Market Turning Positive ``` | Market | Ratio | Trend | |--------|---------|-----------| | NYSE | -1.25 | ↗ 1.75 | | NASDAQ | -0.95 | ↗ 2.80 | | Tick | -1.35 (-250) | ↗ 0.04 | | TickQ | -1.10 (-180) | ↗ 0.02 | ``` **Interpretation**: This is a potential bottoming pattern. Current ratios are still negative (red) showing overall negative breadth, but the trends are all positive (green arrows), indicating improving momentum. This divergence often occurs at market bottoms and could signal an upcoming reversal. Look for confirmation with price action before establishing long positions. ### Example 4: Mixed Market with Divergence ``` | Market | Ratio | Trend | |--------|---------|-----------| | NYSE | 1.45 | ↘ -2.25 | | NASDAQ | -0.85 | ↘ -3.80 | | Tick | 1.20 (230) | ↘ -0.03 | | TickQ | -0.75 (-120) | ↘ -0.02 | ``` **Interpretation**: There's a significant divergence between NYSE (positive ratio) and NASDAQ (negative ratio), while all trends are negative. This suggests sector rotation or a market that's weakening but with certain segments still showing strength. Often seen during late-stage bull markets or in transitions between leadership groups. Consider reducing risk exposure and focusing on relative strength sectors. ## Practical Trading Applications 1. **Confirmation Tool**: Use this indicator to confirm price movements. Strong breadth readings in the direction of the price trend increase confidence in trade decisions. 2. **Early Warning System**: Watch for divergences between price and breadth metrics, which often precede market turns. 3. **Intraday Trading**: The real-time nature of TICK and volume data makes this indicator valuable for day traders to gauge intraday momentum shifts. 4. **Market Regime Identification**: Sustained readings can help identify whether the market is in a trend or chop regime, allowing for appropriate strategy selection. This breadth indicator is most effective when used in conjunction with price action and other technical indicators rather than in isolation.
Pine Script® göstergesi
yelober tarafından
Yelober - Sector Rotation Detector# Yelober - Sector Rotation Detector: User Guide ## Overview The Yelober - Sector Rotation Detector is a TradingView indicator designed to track sector performance and identify market rotations in real-time. It monitors key sector ETFs, calculates performance metrics, and provides actionable stock recommendations based on sector strength and weakness. ## Purpose This indicator helps traders identify when capital is moving from one sector to another (sector rotation), which can provide valuable trading opportunities. It also detects risk-off conditions in the market and highlights sectors with abnormal trading volume. ## Table Columns Explained ### 1. Sector Displays the sector name being monitored. The indicator tracks six primary sectors plus the S&P 500: - Energy (XLE) - Financial (XLF) - Technology (XLK) - Consumer Staples (XLP) - Utilities (XLU) - Consumer Discretionary (XLY) - S&P 500 (SPY) ### 2. Perf % Shows the daily percentage performance of each sector ETF. Values are color-coded: - Green: Positive performance - Red: Negative performance Positive values display with a "+" sign (e.g., +1.25%) ### 3. RSI Displays the Relative Strength Index value for each sector, which helps identify overbought or oversold conditions: - Values above 70 (highlighted in red): Potentially overbought - Values below 30 (highlighted in green): Potentially oversold - Values between 30-70 (highlighted in blue): Neutral territory ### 4. Vol Ratio Shows the volume ratio, which compares today's volume to the average volume over the lookback period: - Values above 1.5x (highlighted in yellow): Indicates abnormally high trading volume - Values below 1.5x (highlighted in blue): Normal trading volume This helps identify sectors with unusual activity that may signal important price movements. ### 5. Trend Displays the current price trend direction with symbols: - ▲ (green): Uptrend (today's close > yesterday's close) - ▼ (red): Downtrend (today's close < yesterday's close) - ◆ (gray): Neutral (today's close = yesterday's close) ## Summary & Recommendations Section The summary section provides: 1. **Sector Rotation Detection**: Identifies when there's a significant performance gap (>2%) between the strongest and weakest sectors. 2. **Risk-Off Mode Detection**: Alerts when defensive sectors (Consumer Staples and Utilities) are positive while Technology is negative, which often signals investors are moving to safer assets. 3. **Strong Volume Detection**: Indicates when any sector shows abnormally high trading volume. 4. **Stock Recommendations**: Suggests specific stocks to consider for long positions (from the strongest sectors) and short positions (from the weakest sectors). ## Example Interpretations ### Example 1: Sector Rotation If you see: - Technology: -1.85% - Financial: +2.10% - Summary shows: "SECTOR ROTATION DETECTED: Rotation from Technology to Financial" **Interpretation**: Capital is moving out of tech stocks and into financial stocks. This could be due to rising interest rates, which typically benefit banks while pressuring high-growth tech companies. Consider looking at financial stocks like JPM, BAC, and WFC for potential long positions. ### Example 2: Risk-Off Conditions If you see: - Consumer Staples: +0.80% - Utilities: +1.20% - Technology: -1.50% - Summary shows: "RISK-OFF MODE DETECTED" **Interpretation**: Investors are seeking safety in defensive sectors while selling growth-oriented tech stocks. This often occurs during market uncertainty or ahead of economic concerns. Consider reducing exposure to high-beta stocks and possibly adding defensive names like PG, KO, or NEE. ### Example 3: Volume Spike If you see: - Energy: +3.20% with Volume Ratio 2.5x (highlighted in yellow) - Summary shows: "STRONG VOLUME DETECTED" **Interpretation**: The energy sector is making a strong move with significantly higher-than-average volume, suggesting conviction behind the price movement. This could indicate the beginning of a sustained trend in energy stocks. Consider names like XOM, CVX, and COP. ## How to Use the Indicator 1. Apply the indicator to any chart (works best on daily timeframes). 2. Customize settings if needed: - Timeframe: Choose between intraday (60 or 240 minutes), daily, or weekly - Lookback Period: Adjust the historical comparison period (default: 20) - RSI Period: Modify the RSI calculation period (default: 14) 3. To refresh the data: Click the settings icon, increase the "Click + to refresh data" counter, and click "OK". 4. Identify opportunities based on sector performance, RSI levels, volume ratios, and the summary recommendations. This indicator helps traders align with market rotation trends and identify which sectors (and specific stocks) may outperform or underperform in the near term.
Pine Script® göstergesi
yelober tarafından
7
MC Geopolitical Tension Events📌 Script Title: Geopolitical Tension Events 📖 Description: This script highlights key geopolitical and military tension events from 1914 to 2024 that have historically impacted global markets. It automatically plots vertical dashed lines and labels on the chart at the time of each major event. This allows traders and analysts to visually assess how markets have responded to global crises, wars, and significant political instability over time. 🧠 Use Cases: Historical backtesting: Understand how market responded to past geopolitical shocks. Contextual analysis: Add macro context to technical setups. 🗓️ List of Geopolitical Tension Events in the Script Date Event Title Description 1914-07-28 WWI Begins Outbreak of World War I following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. 1929-10-24 Wall Street Crash Black Thursday, the start of the 1929 stock market crash. 1939-09-01 WWII Begins Germany invades Poland, starting World War II. 1941-12-07 Pearl Harbor Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor; U.S. enters WWII. 1945-08-06 Hiroshima Bombing First atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima by the U.S. 1950-06-25 Korean War Begins North Korea invades South Korea. 1962-10-16 Cuban Missile Crisis 13-day standoff between the U.S. and USSR over missiles in Cuba. 1973-10-06 Yom Kippur War Egypt and Syria launch surprise attack on Israel. 1979-11-04 Iran Hostage Crisis U.S. Embassy in Tehran seized; 52 hostages taken. 1990-08-02 Gulf War Begins Iraq invades Kuwait, triggering U.S. intervention. 2001-09-11 9/11 Attacks Coordinated terrorist attacks on the U.S. 2003-03-20 Iraq War Begins U.S.-led invasion of Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein. 2008-09-15 Lehman Collapse Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers; peak of global financial crisis. 2014-03-01 Crimea Crisis Russia annexes Crimea from Ukraine. 2020-01-03 Soleimani Strike U.S. drone strike kills Iranian General Qasem Soleimani. 2022-02-24 Ukraine Invasion Russia launches full-scale invasion of Ukraine. 2023-10-07 Hamas-Israel War Hamas launches attack on Israel, sparking war in Gaza. 2024-01-12 Red Sea Crisis Houthis attack ships in Red Sea, prompting Western naval response.
Pine Script® göstergesi
marketcardiogram tarafından
Yelober - Intraday ETF Dashboard# How to Read the Yelober Intraday ETF Dashboard The Intraday ETF Dashboard provides a powerful at-a-glance view of sector performance and trading opportunities. Here's how to interpret and use the information: ## Basic Dashboard Reading ### Color-Coding System - **Green values**: Positive performance or bullish signals - **Red values**: Negative performance or bearish signals - **Symbol colors**: Green = buy signal, Red = sell signal, Gray = neutral ### Example 1: Identifying Strong Sectors If you see XLF (Financials) with: - Day % showing +2.65% (green background) - Symbol in green color - RSI of 58 (not overbought) **Interpretation**: Financial sector is showing strength and momentum without being overextended. Consider long positions in top financial stocks like JPM or BAC. ### Example 2: Spotting Weakness If you see XLK (Technology) with: - Day % showing -1.20% (red background) - Week % showing -3.50% (red background) - Symbol in red color - RSI of 35 (approaching oversold) **Interpretation**: Technology sector is showing weakness across multiple timeframes. Consider avoiding tech stocks or taking short positions in names like MSFT or AAPL, but be cautious as the low RSI suggests a bounce may be coming. ## Advanced Interpretations ### Example 3: Sector Rotation Detection If you observe: - XLE (Energy) showing +2.10% while XLK (Technology) showing -1.50% - Both sectors' Week % values showing the opposite trend **Interpretation**: This suggests money is rotating out of technology into energy stocks. This rotation pattern is actionable - consider reducing tech exposure and increasing energy positions (look at XOM, CVX in the Top Stocks column). ### Example 4: RSI Divergences If you see XLU (Utilities) with: - Day % showing +0.50% (small positive) - RSI showing 72 (overbought, red background) **Interpretation**: Despite positive performance, the high RSI suggests the sector is overextended. This divergence between price and indicator suggests caution - the rally in utilities may be running out of steam. ### Example 5: Relative Strength in Weak Markets If SPY shows -1.20% but XLP (Consumer Staples) shows +0.30%: **Interpretation**: Consumer staples are showing defensive strength during market weakness. This is typical risk-off behavior. Consider defensive positions in stocks like PG, KO, or PEP for protection. ## Practical Application Scenarios ### Day Trading Setup 1. **Morning Market Assessment**: - Check which sectors are green pre-market - Focus on sectors with Day % > 1% and RSI between 40-70 - Identify 2-3 stocks from the Top Stocks column of the strongest sector 2. **Midday Reversal Hunting**: - Look for sectors with symbol color changing from red to green - Confirm with RSI moving away from extremes - Trade stocks from that sector showing similar pattern changes ### Swing Trading Application 1. **Trend Following**: - Identify sectors with positive Day % and Week % - Look for RSI values in uptrend but not overbought (45-65) - Enter positions in top stocks from these sectors, using daily charts for confirmation 2. **Contrarian Setups**: - Find sectors with deeply negative Day % but RSI < 30 - Look for divergence (price making new lows but RSI rising) - Consider counter-trend positions in the stronger stocks within these oversold sectors ## Reading Special Conditions ### Example 6: Risk-Off Environment If you observe: - XLP (Consumer Staples) and XLU (Utilities) both green - XLK (Technology) and XLY (Consumer Disc) both red - SPY slightly negative **Interpretation**: Classic risk-off rotation. Investors are moving to safety. Consider defensive positioning and reducing exposure to growth sectors. ### Example 7: Market Breadth Analysis Count the number of sectors in green vs. red: - If 7+ sectors are green: Strong bullish breadth, consider aggressive long positioning - If 7+ sectors are red: Weak market breadth, consider defensive positioning or shorts - If evenly split: Market is indecisive, focus on specific sector strength instead of broad market exposure Remember that this dashboard is most effective when combined with broader market analysis and appropriate risk management strategies.
Pine Script® göstergesi
yelober tarafından
Greer Value📈 Greer Value This indicator evaluates the year-over-year (YoY) growth consistency of five key fundamental metrics for any stock: Book Value Per Share Free Cash Flow Operating Margin Total Revenue Net Income The script tracks whether each metric increases annually based on financial statement data (FY), then calculates both individual and aggregate increase percentages over time. A color-coded table is displayed on the most recent bar showing: Raw counts of increases vs. checks per metric Percentage of years with growth Overall "Greer Value" score indicating total consistency across all five metrics ✅ Green = Strong YoY growth ❌ Red = Weak or inconsistent growth Use this tool to help identify fundamentally improving companies with long-term value creation potential.
Pine Script® göstergesi
controllinghand tarafından
Discount to Net Asset ValueOverview This indicator helps investors and analysts identify when a company’s stock is trading below or above its intrinsic value. A persistent discount may highlight potential value opportunities, while a sustained premium could signal overvaluation or strong market sentiment. By visually shading the background and plotting the discount/premium percentage, users can quickly screen for undervalued stocks, confirm fundamental research, and make more informed buy or sell decisions. Usage Calculates the Net Asset Value discount (or premium) for any symbol. By default the indicator uses the current chart symbol’s TOTAL_ASSETS, TOTAL_LIABILITIES, and TOTAL_SHARES_OUTSTANDING. You can select another symbol by checking “Use Custom Symbol” and entering the ticker of the other symbol. This is useful for comparing the Discount to NAV across symbols. Shows the percentage discount (or premium) of market capitalization relative to net asset value. Recommended timeframes: daily bars or higher. Reporting Periods: • FQ = Fiscal Quarter • FY = Fiscal Year • TTM = Trailing Twelve Months Note: NAV is pulled on the chosen reporting period (FQ, FY, TTM). By default the background is shaded red to illustrate a discount to NAV and green to illustrate a premium to NAV. This can be toggled in the settings.
Pine Script® göstergesi
quickshiftinn tarafından
Futures vs CFD Price Display 🎯 Trading the same asset in CFDs and Futures but tired of switching charts to compare prices? This is your indicator! Stop the constant chart hopping! This live price comparison shows you instantly where the better conditions are. ✨ What you get: Bidirectional: Works in both Futures AND CFD charts Live prices: Real-time comparison of both markets Spread calculation: Automatic difference in points and percentage Fully customizable: Colors, position, size to your liking Professional design: Clean display with symbol header 🎯 Perfect for: Gold traders (Futures vs CFD) Arbitrage strategies Spread monitoring Multi-broker comparisons ⚙️ Customization: 3 sizes (Small/Normal/Large) for all screens 4 positions available Individual color schemes Toggle features on/off 💡 Simply enter the symbol and keep both markets in sight! Notice: "Co-developed with Claude AI (Anthropic) - because even AI needs to pay the server bills! 😄"
Pine Script® göstergesi
GoldenDayTrader tarafından
COT-Index-NocTradingCOT Index Indicator The COT Index Indicator is a powerful tool designed to visualize the Commitment of Traders (COT) data and offer insights into market sentiment. The COT Index is a measurement of the relative positioning of commercial traders versus non-commercial and retail traders in the futures market. It is widely used to identify potential market reversals by observing the extremes in trader positioning. Customizable Timeframe: The indicator allows you to choose a custom time interval (in months) to visualize the COT data, making it flexible to fit different trading styles and strategies. How to Use: Visualize Market Sentiment: A COT Index near extremes (close to 0 or 100) can indicate potential turning points in the market, as it reflects extreme positioning of different market participant groups. Adjust the Time Interval: The ability to adjust the time interval (in months) gives traders the flexibility to analyze the market over different periods, which can be useful in detecting longer-term trends or short-term shifts in sentiment. Combine with Other Indicators: To enhance your analysis, combine the COT Index with your technical analysis. This tool can serve as an invaluable addition to your trading strategy, providing a deeper understanding of the market dynamics and the positioning of major market participants.
Pine Script® göstergesi
NocTrading tarafından
1
PER Bands (Auto EPS)PER Bands Indicator - Technical Specification Function This PineScript v6 overlay indicator displays horizontal price bands based on Price-to-Earnings Ratio multiples. The indicator calculates price levels by multiplying earnings per share values by user-defined PER multiples, then plots these levels as horizontal lines on the chart. Data Sources The script attempts to automatically retrieve earnings per share data using TradingView's `request.financial()` function. The system first queries trailing twelve months EPS data, then annual EPS data if TTM is unavailable. When automatic retrieval fails or returns zero values, the indicator uses manually entered EPS values as a fallback. Configuration Options Users can configure five separate PER multiples (default values: 10x, 15x, 20x, 25x, 30x). Each band supports individual color customization and adjustable line width settings from 1 to 5 pixels. The indicator includes toggles for band visibility and optional fill areas between adjacent bands with 95% transparency. Visual Components The indicator plots five horizontal lines representing different PER valuation levels. Optional fill areas create colored zones between consecutive bands. A data table in the top-right corner displays current EPS source, EPS value, current PER ratio, and calculated price levels for each configured multiple. Calculation Method The indicator performs the following calculations: - Band Price = Current EPS × PER Multiple - Current PER = Current Price ÷ Current EPS These calculations update on each bar close using the most recent available EPS data. Alert System The script includes alert conditions for price crossovers above the lowest PER band and crossunders below the highest PER band. Additional alert conditions can be configured for any band level through the alert creation interface. Debug Features Debug mode displays character markers on the chart indicating when TTM or annual EPS data is available. This feature helps users verify which data source the indicator is using for calculations. Data Requirements The indicator requires positive, non-zero EPS values to function correctly. Stocks with negative earnings or zero EPS will display "N/A" for current PER calculations, though bands will still plot using the manual EPS input value. Exchange Compatibility Automatic EPS data availability varies by exchange. United States equity markets typically provide comprehensive fundamental data coverage. International markets may have limited automatic data availability, requiring manual EPS input for accurate calculations. Technical Limitations The indicator cannot fetch real-time EPS updates and relies on TradingView's fundamental data refresh schedule. Historical EPS changes are not reflected in past band positions, as the indicator uses current EPS values for all historical calculations. Display Settings The information table shows EPS source type (TTM Auto, Annual Auto, Manual, or Manual Fallback), allowing users to verify data accuracy. The table refreshes only on the last bar to optimize performance and reduce computational overhead. Code Structure Built using PineScript v6 syntax with proper scope management for plot and fill functions. The script uses global scope for all plot declarations and conditional logic within plot parameters to handle visibility settings. Version Requirements This indicator requires TradingView Pine Script version 6 or later due to the use of `request.financial()` functions and updated syntax requirements for plot titles and fill operations.
Pine Script® göstergesi
hungryWhale69029 tarafından
Advanced Petroleum Market Model (APMM)Advanced Petroleum Market Model (APMM): A Multi-Factor Fundamental Analysis Framework for Oil Market Assessment ## 1. Introduction The petroleum market represents one of the most complex and globally significant commodity markets, characterized by intricate supply-demand dynamics, geopolitical influences, and substantial price volatility (Hamilton, 2009). Traditional fundamental analysis approaches often struggle to synthesize the multitude of relevant indicators into actionable insights due to data heterogeneity, temporal misalignment, and subjective weighting schemes (Baumeister & Kilian, 2016). The Advanced Petroleum Market Model addresses these limitations through a systematic, quantitative approach that integrates 16 verified fundamental indicators across five critical market dimensions. The model builds upon established financial engineering principles while incorporating petroleum-specific market dynamics and adaptive learning mechanisms. ## 2. Theoretical Framework ### 2.1 Market Efficiency and Information Integration The model operates under the assumption of semi-strong market efficiency, where fundamental information is gradually incorporated into prices with varying degrees of lag (Fama, 1970). The petroleum market's unique characteristics, including storage costs, transportation constraints, and geopolitical risk premiums, create opportunities for fundamental analysis to provide predictive value (Kilian, 2009). ### 2.2 Multi-Factor Asset Pricing Theory Drawing from Ross's (1976) Arbitrage Pricing Theory, the model treats petroleum prices as driven by multiple systematic risk factors. The five-factor decomposition (Supply, Inventory, Demand, Trade, Sentiment) represents economically meaningful sources of systematic risk in petroleum markets (Chen et al., 1986). ## 3. Methodology ### 3.1 Data Sources and Quality Framework The model integrates 16 fundamental indicators sourced from verified TradingView economic data feeds: Supply Indicators: - US Oil Production (ECONOMICS:USCOP) - US Oil Rigs Count (ECONOMICS:USCOR) - API Crude Runs (ECONOMICS:USACR) Inventory Indicators: - US Crude Stock Changes (ECONOMICS:USCOSC) - Cushing Stocks (ECONOMICS:USCCOS) - API Crude Stocks (ECONOMICS:USCSC) - API Gasoline Stocks (ECONOMICS:USGS) - API Distillate Stocks (ECONOMICS:USDS) Demand Indicators: - Refinery Crude Runs (ECONOMICS:USRCR) - Gasoline Production (ECONOMICS:USGPRO) - Distillate Production (ECONOMICS:USDFP) - Industrial Production Index (FRED:INDPRO) Trade Indicators: - US Crude Imports (ECONOMICS:USCOI) - US Oil Exports (ECONOMICS:USOE) - API Crude Imports (ECONOMICS:USCI) - Dollar Index (TVC:DXY) Sentiment Indicators: - Oil Volatility Index (CBOE:OVX) ### 3.2 Data Quality Monitoring System Following best practices in quantitative finance (Lopez de Prado, 2018), the model implements comprehensive data quality monitoring: Data Quality Score = Σ(Individual Indicator Validity) / Total Indicators Where validity is determined by: - Non-null data availability - Positive value validation - Temporal consistency checks ### 3.3 Statistical Normalization Framework #### 3.3.1 Z-Score Normalization The model employs robust Z-score normalization as established by Sharpe (1994) for cross-indicator comparability: Z_i,t = (X_i,t - μ_i) / σ_i Where: - X_i,t = Raw value of indicator i at time t - μ_i = Sample mean of indicator i - σ_i = Sample standard deviation of indicator i Z-scores are capped at ±3 to mitigate outlier influence (Tukey, 1977). #### 3.3.2 Percentile Rank Transformation For intuitive interpretation, Z-scores are converted to percentile ranks following the methodology of Conover (1999): Percentile_Rank = (Number of values < current_value) / Total_observations × 100 ### 3.4 Exponential Smoothing Framework Signal smoothing employs exponential weighted moving averages (Brown, 1963) with adaptive alpha parameter: S_t = α × X_t + (1-α) × S_{t-1} Where α = 2/(N+1) and N represents the smoothing period. ### 3.5 Dynamic Threshold Optimization The model implements adaptive thresholds using Bollinger Band methodology (Bollinger, 1992): Dynamic_Threshold = μ ± (k × σ) Where k is the threshold multiplier adjusted for market volatility regime. ### 3.6 Composite Score Calculation The fundamental score integrates component scores through weighted averaging: Fundamental_Score = Σ(w_i × Score_i × Quality_i) Where: - w_i = Normalized component weight - Score_i = Component fundamental score - Quality_i = Data quality adjustment factor ## 4. Implementation Architecture ### 4.1 Adaptive Parameter Framework The model incorporates regime-specific adjustments based on market volatility: Volatility_Regime = σ_price / μ_price × 100 High volatility regimes (>25%) trigger enhanced weighting for inventory and sentiment components, reflecting increased market sensitivity to supply disruptions and psychological factors. ### 4.2 Data Synchronization Protocol Given varying publication frequencies (daily, weekly, monthly), the model employs forward-fill synchronization to maintain temporal alignment across all indicators. ### 4.3 Quality-Adjusted Scoring Component scores are adjusted for data quality to prevent degraded inputs from contaminating the composite signal: Adjusted_Score = Raw_Score × Quality_Factor + 50 × (1 - Quality_Factor) This formulation ensures that poor-quality data reverts toward neutral (50) rather than contributing noise. ## 5. Usage Guidelines and Best Practices ### 5.1 Configuration Recommendations For Short-term Analysis (1-4 weeks): - Lookback Period: 26 weeks - Smoothing Length: 3-5 periods - Confidence Period: 13 weeks - Increase inventory and sentiment weights For Medium-term Analysis (1-3 months): - Lookback Period: 52 weeks - Smoothing Length: 5-8 periods - Confidence Period: 26 weeks - Balanced component weights For Long-term Analysis (3+ months): - Lookback Period: 104 weeks - Smoothing Length: 8-12 periods - Confidence Period: 52 weeks - Increase supply and demand weights ### 5.2 Signal Interpretation Framework Bullish Signals (Score > 70): - Fundamental conditions favor price appreciation - Consider long positions or reduced short exposure - Monitor for trend confirmation across multiple timeframes Bearish Signals (Score < 30): - Fundamental conditions suggest price weakness - Consider short positions or reduced long exposure - Evaluate downside protection strategies Neutral Range (30-70): - Mixed fundamental environment - Favor range-bound or volatility strategies - Wait for clearer directional signals ### 5.3 Risk Management Considerations 1. Data Quality Monitoring: Continuously monitor the data quality dashboard. Scores below 75% warrant increased caution. 2. Regime Awareness: Adjust position sizing based on volatility regime indicators. High volatility periods require reduced exposure. 3. Correlation Analysis: Monitor correlation with crude oil prices to validate model effectiveness. 4. Fundamental-Technical Divergence: Pay attention when fundamental signals diverge from technical indicators, as this may signal regime changes. ### 5.4 Alert System Optimization Configure alerts conservatively to avoid false signals: - Set alert threshold at 75+ for high-confidence signals - Enable data quality warnings to maintain system integrity - Use trend reversal alerts for early regime change detection ## 6. Model Validation and Performance Metrics ### 6.1 Statistical Validation The model's statistical robustness is ensured through: - Out-of-sample testing protocols - Rolling window validation - Bootstrap confidence intervals - Regime-specific performance analysis ### 6.2 Economic Validation Fundamental accuracy is validated against: - Energy Information Administration (EIA) official reports - International Energy Agency (IEA) market assessments - Commercial inventory data verification ## 7. Limitations and Considerations ### 7.1 Model Limitations 1. Data Dependency: Model performance is contingent on data availability and quality from external sources. 2. US Market Focus: Primary data sources are US-centric, potentially limiting global applicability. 3. Lag Effects: Some fundamental indicators exhibit publication lags that may delay signal generation. 4. Regime Shifts: Structural market changes may require model recalibration. ### 7.2 Market Environment Considerations The model is optimized for normal market conditions. During extreme events (e.g., geopolitical crises, pandemics), additional qualitative factors should be considered alongside quantitative signals. ## References Baumeister, C., & Kilian, L. (2016). Forty years of oil price fluctuations: Why the price of oil may still surprise us. *Journal of Economic Perspectives*, 30(1), 139-160. Bollinger, J. (1992). *Bollinger on Bollinger Bands*. McGraw-Hill. Brown, R. G. (1963). *Smoothing, Forecasting and Prediction of Discrete Time Series*. Prentice-Hall. Chen, N. F., Roll, R., & Ross, S. A. (1986). Economic forces and the stock market. *Journal of Business*, 59(3), 383-403. Conover, W. J. (1999). *Practical Nonparametric Statistics* (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. *Journal of Finance*, 25(2), 383-417. Hamilton, J. D. (2009). Understanding crude oil prices. *Energy Journal*, 30(2), 179-206. Kilian, L. (2009). Not all oil price shocks are alike: Disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. *American Economic Review*, 99(3), 1053-1069. Lopez de Prado, M. (2018). *Advances in Financial Machine Learning*. John Wiley & Sons. Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. *Journal of Economic Theory*, 13(3), 341-360. Sharpe, W. F. (1994). The Sharpe ratio. *Journal of Portfolio Management*, 21(1), 49-58. Tukey, J. W. (1977). *Exploratory Data Analysis*. Addison-Wesley.
Pine Script® göstergesi
EdgeTools tarafından
BTC Thermocap Z-ScoreBTC Thermocap Indicator Overview The BTC Thermocap is a specialized on-chain ratio indicator designed to provide deeper insight into Bitcoin's market valuation relative to its cumulative issuance. By comparing the current market price of Bitcoin to the total value of all BTC ever mined (also known as "thermocap"), this indicator helps identify potential overvaluation or undervaluation periods within the Bitcoin market cycle. Key Features and Customizable Inputs: Moving Average Length (MA Length) Moving Average Type (MA Type) - SMA or EMA Z-Score Calculation Length Z-Score Toggle (Use Z-Score)
Pine Script® göstergesi
QuantChook tarafından
Last Week's APM FX pairs only📖 Description: This script is designed for precision-focused forex traders who understand the power of volatility measurement. It calculates the Average Price Movement (APM) from the previous week by measuring the full wick-to-wick range (high to low) of each daily candle from Monday to Friday, then averaging them across the five sessions. 🔍 Core Features: ✅ Accurate APM Calculation: Pulls daily high-low ranges from last week using locked daily timeframe data, ensuring stable and reliable pip range measurements across all chart timeframes. ✅ Auto-Adjusts for Pip Precision: Detects whether the pair is JPY-based or not, and automatically adjusts the pip multiplier (100 for JPY pairs, 10,000 for all others) to give true pip values. ✅ Visual Display in Clean UI: The calculated APM is displayed in a non-intrusive, fixed-position table in the top-right corner of the chart — making it ideal for traders who want continuous awareness of recent market behavior without visual clutter. ✅ Timeless on Any Timeframe: Whether you’re on the 1-minute chart or the daily, the script remains anchored and accurate because it sources raw data from the daily chart internally. 📈 How It Helps Your Trading: 🧠 Volatility Awareness: Know how much a pair typically moves per day based on recent historical behavior — great for range analysis, target setting, or session biasing. 📊 Week-to-Week Comparison: Use it as a benchmark to compare current volatility to last week’s. Great for identifying if the market is expanding, contracting, or stabilizing. 🔗 Perfect for Confluence: APM can serve as a supporting metric when combined with order blocks, liquidity zones, news catalysts, or other volatility-based tools like ATR. 🛠️ Ideal For: Professional and prop firm traders Institutional model traders (ICT-style or SMC) Volatility scalpers and range-based intraday traders Anyone building a rules-based trading system with data-driven logic 🔐 Clean. Reliable. Focused. If you value structure, volatility awareness, and pip precision — this tool belongs in your chart workspace.
Pine Script® göstergesi
delorean369 tarafından
5-Day APM for Forex PairsThis script calculates the 5-Day Average Pip Movement (APM) for major Forex pairs. It displays the average daily range (in pips) over the past 5 trading days using true high-low price movement. The script is optimized for clarity and minimalism — showing a single floating label on the main chart for pairs like GBPUSD, USDJPY, EURUSD, etc. Automatically adjusts pip calculation for JPY pairs (×100) and other pairs (×10000). ✅ Great for identifying high-volatility vs low-volatility conditions ✅ Clean design with no clutter ✅ Only works on major FX pairs (whitelisted)
Pine Script® göstergesi
delorean369 tarafından
MVRV Ratio [Alpha Extract]The MVRV Ratio Indicator provides valuable insights into Bitcoin market cycles by tracking the relationship between market value and realized value. This powerful on-chain metric helps traders identify potential market tops and bottoms, offering clear buy and sell signals based on historical patterns of Bitcoin valuation. 🔶 CALCULATION The indicator processes MVRV ratio data through several analytical methods: Raw MVRV Data: Collects MVRV data directly from INTOTHEBLOCK for Bitcoin Optional Smoothing: Applies simple moving average (SMA) to reduce noise Status Classification: Categorizes market conditions into four distinct states Signal Generation: Produces trading signals based on MVRV thresholds Price Estimation: Calculates estimated realized price (Current price / MVRV ratio) Historical Context: Compares current values to historical extremes Formula: MVRV Ratio = Market Value / Realized Value Smoothed MVRV = SMA(MVRV Ratio, Smoothing Length) Estimated Realized Price = Current Price / MVRV Ratio Distance to Top = ((3.5 / MVRV Ratio) - 1) * 100 Distance to Bottom = ((MVRV Ratio / 0.8) - 1) * 100 🔶 DETAILS Visual Features: MVRV Plot: Color-coded line showing current MVRV value (red for overvalued, orange for moderately overvalued, blue for fair value, teal for undervalued) Reference Levels: Horizontal lines indicating key MVRV thresholds (3.5, 2.5, 1.0, 0.8) Zone Highlighting: Background color changes to highlight extreme market conditions (red for potentially overvalued, blue for potentially undervalued) Information Table: Comprehensive dashboard showing current MVRV value, market status, trading signal, price information, and historical context Interpretation: MVRV ≥ 3.5: Potential market top, strong sell signal MVRV ≥ 2.5: Overvalued market, consider selling MVRV 1.5-2.5: Neutral market conditions MVRV 1.0-1.5: Fair value, consider buying MVRV < 1.0: Potential market bottom, strong buy signal 🔶 EXAMPLES Market Top Identification: When MVRV ratio exceeds 3.5, the indicator signals potential market tops, highlighting periods where Bitcoin may be significantly overvalued. Example: During bull market peaks, MVRV exceeding 3.5 has historically preceded major corrections, helping traders time their exits. Bottom Detection: MVRV values below 1.0, especially approaching 0.8, have historically marked excellent buying opportunities. Example: During bear market bottoms, MVRV falling below 1.0 has identified the most profitable entry points for long-term Bitcoin accumulation. Tracking Market Cycles: The indicator provides a clear visualization of Bitcoin's market cycles from undervalued to overvalued states. Example: Following the progression of MVRV from below 1.0 through fair value and eventually to overvalued territory helps traders position themselves appropriately throughout Bitcoin's market cycle. Realized Price Support: The estimated realized price often acts as a significant support/resistance level during market transitions. Example: During corrections, price often finds support near the realized price level calculated by the indicator, providing potential entry points. 🔶 SETTINGS Customization Options: Smoothing: Toggle smoothing option and adjust smoothing length (1-50) Table Display: Show/hide the information table Table Position: Choose between top right, top left, bottom right, or bottom left positions Visual Elements: All plots, lines, and background highlights can be customized for color and style The MVRV Ratio Indicator provides traders with a powerful on-chain metric to identify potential market tops and bottoms in Bitcoin. By tracking the relationship between market value and realized value, this indicator helps identify periods of overvaluation and undervaluation, offering clear buy and sell signals based on historical patterns. The comprehensive information table delivers valuable context about current market conditions, helping traders make more informed decisions about market positioning throughout Bitcoin's cyclical patterns.
Pine Script® göstergesi
AlphaExtract tarafından
Dr.Avinash Talele quarterly earnings, VCP and multibagger trakerDr. Avinash Talele Quarterly Earnings, VCP and Multibagger Tracker. 📊 Comprehensive Quarterly Analysis Tool for Multibagger Stock Discovery This advanced Pine Script indicator provides a complete financial snapshot directly on your chart, designed to help traders and investors identify potential multibagger stocks and VCP (Volatility Contraction Pattern) setups with precision. 🎯 Key Features: 📈 8-Quarter Financial Data Display: EPS (Earnings Per Share) - Track profitability trends Sales Revenue - Monitor business growth QoQ% (Quarter-over-Quarter Growth) - Spot acceleration/deceleration ROE (Return on Equity) - Assess management efficiency OPM (Operating Profit Margin) - Evaluate operational excellence 💰 Market Metrics: Market Cap - Current company valuation P/E Ratio - Valuation assessment Free Float - Liquidity indicator 📊 Technical Positioning: % Down from 52-Week High - Identify potential bottoming patterns % Up from 52-Week Low - Track momentum from lows Turnover Data (1D & 50D Average) - Volume analysis ADR% (Average Daily Range) - Volatility measurement Relative Volume% - Institutional interest indicator 🚀 How It Helps Find Multibaggers: 1. Growth Acceleration Detection: Consistent EPS Growth: Identifies companies with accelerating earnings Revenue Momentum: Tracks sales growth patterns quarter-over-quarter Margin Expansion: Spots improving operational efficiency through OPM trends 2. VCP Pattern Recognition: Volatility Contraction: ADR% helps identify tightening price ranges Volume Analysis: Relative volume shows institutional accumulation Distance from Highs: Tracks healthy pullbacks in uptrends 3. Fundamental Strength Validation: ROE Trends: Ensures management is efficiently using shareholder capital Debt-Free Growth: High ROE with growing margins indicates quality growth Scalability: Revenue growth vs. margin expansion analysis 4. Entry Timing Optimization: 52-Week Positioning: Enter near lows, avoid near highs Volume Confirmation: High relative volume confirms breakout potential Valuation Check: P/E ratio helps avoid overvalued entries 💡 Multibagger Characteristics to Look For: ✅ Consistent 15-20%+ EPS growth across multiple quarters ✅ Accelerating revenue growth with QoQ% improvements ✅ ROE above 15% and expanding ✅ Operating margins improving over time ✅ Low debt (indicated by high ROE with growing profits) ✅ Strong cash generation (reflected in consistent growth metrics) ✅ 20-40% down from 52-week highs (ideal entry zones) ✅ Above-average volume during consolidation phases 🎨 Visual Design: Clean white table with black borders for maximum readability Color-coded QoQ% changes (Green = Growth, Red = Decline) Centered positioning for easy chart analysis 8-quarter historical view for trend identification 📋 Perfect For: Long-term investors seeking multibagger opportunities Growth stock enthusiasts tracking earnings acceleration VCP pattern traders looking for breakout candidates Fundamental analysts requiring quick financial snapshots Swing traders timing entries in growth stocks ⚡ Quick Setup: Simply add the indicator to any NSE/BSE stock chart and instantly view comprehensive quarterly data. The table updates automatically with the latest financial information, making it perfect for screening and monitoring your watchlist. 🔍 Start identifying your next multibagger today with this powerful combination of fundamental analysis and technical positioning data! Disclaimer: This indicator is for educational and analysis purposes. Always conduct thorough research and consider risk management before making investment decisions.
Pine Script® göstergesi
dravinashmedicaloncology tarafından
Smooth BTCSPL [GiudiceQuantico] – Dual Smoothed MAsSmooth BTCSPL – Dual Smoothed MAs What it measures • % of Bitcoin addresses in profit vs loss (on-chain tickers). • Spread = profit % − loss % → quick aggregate-sentiment gauge. • Optional alpha-decay normalisation ⇒ keeps the curve on a 0-1 scale across cycles. User inputs • Use Alpha-Decay Adjusted Input (true/false). • Fast MA – type (SMA / EMA / WMA / VWMA) & length (default 100). • Slow MA – type & length (default 200). • Colours – Bullish (#00ffbb) / Bearish (magenta). Computation flow 1. Fetch daily on-chain series. 2. Build raw spread. 3. If alpha-decay enabled: alpha = (rawSpread − 140-week rolling min) / (1 − rolling min). 4. Smooth chosen base with Fast & Slow MAs. 5. Bullish when Fast > Slow, bearish otherwise. 6. Bars tinted with the same bull/bear colour. How to read • Fast crosses above Slow → rising “addresses-in-profit” momentum → bullish bias. • Fast crosses below Slow → stress / capitulation risk. • Price-indicator divergences can flag exhaustion or hidden accumulation. Tips • Keep in a separate pane (overlay = false); bar-colouring still shows on price chart. • Shorter lengths for swing trades, longer for macro outlook. • Combine with funding rates, NUPL or simple price-MA crossovers for confirmation.
Pine Script® göstergesi
GuidiceQuantico tarafından
Liquidity LinesLiquidity Lines Indicator This advanced TradingView indicator identifies key liquidity zones on your price chart by detecting bullish and bearish engulfing candles, which often signify areas where liquidity accumulates. It helps traders visually spot potential support and resistance levels created by market participants’ stop-loss orders or pending orders. Key Features : -Aggregated Bars Option : Smooth out price data by grouping bars together, enabling clearer liquidity zone identification on higher timeframes or noisy charts. -Upper Liquidity Lines : Displays dashed lines at recent highs where bearish engulfing patterns indicate potential resistance or supply zones. -Lower Liquidity Lines : Displays dashed lines at recent lows where bullish engulfing patterns suggest potential support or demand zones. -Customizable Colors : Choose your preferred colors for bullish (default black) and bearish (default white) liquidity lines for better visual distinction. -Automatic Line Cleanup : Maintains chart clarity by automatically removing old liquidity lines after a configurable limit. -Dynamic Alerts : Trigger alerts when price breaches upper or lower liquidity lines, signaling potential breakout or reversal opportunities. Use Cases :
Pine Script® göstergesi
The_Forex_Steward tarafından