and finding little. 2100 seems to be decision zone. bu this dip? or let it slip? indicators say we have another week or so of this volatility. FED speech today is huuuuge. Lots of pressure to sound like a dove, and if not lookout below. also big figures coming out this week, retail numbers could be weak,and market expectng a bounce. Italian banks. And some not mentioned news, bulk shippers holding 15 billion in goods waiting at sea to deliver and cannot, went into bankruptcy. some are perishables. could effect prices and inventories for Christmas. sending retail sector into a nose dive, unless a judge saves the day. september could be mr toads wild ride.
Yorumlar
samjp2
⋅
Thank you for the post. I believe a judge issued an order to allow unloading - and it has already occurred over 4 or 5 hours ago.
While I agree you are great at technical s and you push some valid arguments, it is also glaringly obvious that you are clutching for reasons (perishable good for xmas when ship already unloaded?) - you would be better served laying off the theatrics and pushing valid reasons and technical s to support your view.
I am a fan, but I also like a neutral analysis of fundamental reasons to support a view :)
claydoctor
⋅
I posted a "what should have happened" chart months ago, based on fundamentals. News, politics, fed speak, natural disasters, brexit, currency manipulation, governments buying stocks and (their own) bonds with printed and borrowed money, and the list of non fundamentals that effect stock prices and momentum is huuuuuge. Fundamentals are only a factor now, when they used to be everything.
claydoctor
⋅
If stocks were not the only game in town to get yield, they would have tanked long ago.
While I agree you are great at technical s and you push some valid arguments, it is also glaringly obvious that you are clutching for reasons (perishable good for xmas when ship already unloaded?) - you would be better served laying off the theatrics and pushing valid reasons and technical s to support your view.
I am a fan, but I also like a neutral analysis of fundamental reasons to support a view :)