Sub-sector Relative Performance - study.

66
Studying the RP of sub-sectors after the "tariff crash" to see if it had any predictive power.

SOXX : 80% to the top. 112% return.
Not
ETHA : 183%. -- 230% return.

BLOK 72% potential. -- 140% return. (sloped 200dma)

TAN 40% pot. -- 107% return. (Low base.. no resistance?)

Not
IDGT 33% pot. --- 40% return.

ARTY 56% pot. --- 95% return.

TOTAL 60% pot. --- 82% return.

UFO 43% pot. --- 123% return. (low base? near 50% fib LOG).

ROBO 39%. --- 62% return (50% FIB log support).

IBIT 41% ---- 66% return. (50% FIB support).

RING 16% --- 120%.

ICOP 34% ---- 88%.

Not
Performance since september:

SOXX: 30%
ETHA: ---
IBIT: ---
BLOK: 30%
TAN: 30%
IDGT: 10%
ARTY: 25%
TOTAL: ----
UFO: 20%
ROBO: 12%
RING: 32% !
ICOP: 19%.
Not
test

BLOK RS.
Not
test

IBIT. not ideal RS in ~July. and not keeping up around september. (bad?)
Not
test

RING or Gold, clear outperformance ~July. and flying BEFORE september.
Not
test

oih rally pre november (hint)
Not
test

SOXX and FAANG rally post september, prob best indicator for value?
biotech and other sectors were on pause. (as a secondary quality).
OIH was choppy in september.

Cyber security has been choppy.

Gold been going hard in september.

BTC choppy but also third bull market year.
Not
test

the best sectors pre period have an "accumulation" zone, sharp 10/20s.
Not
test

BLOK/SPX, consistent higher lows and highs.
Not
test

RING/SPX.
Probably explains the leadership (because demand).
Not
test

SOXX/spx.
Not
test

biotech/spx
Not
test

OIH/SPX outperformance and RIG output.
Not
BTC: Careful out there.

BTC/SPX (as a risk on gauge?) could signal market top-top?
Not
test

Homebuilder outperformance and NAIL performance.
Not
test

Gold outperformance. Not ideal. but could be the "driver"?
Not
test

Insurance ETF outperformance and UNH. stay away?:)
Not
test

tech underperforming, probably early sign for top-top? also wasnt the case for FAANG. which was probably the reason why no immediate correction. Follow the money?
Not
test

last legs for small caps?
I remember using these graphs and would not know how to interpret.
Not
test
Not
test

silver and gold.
Not
test

another dimension could be the steepness of the trend?
Not
test

TAN underperforms SOXX. maybe could just use /QQQ divide. or /SOXX (best sector)?
Not
test

Gold outperforms SOXX since early 2024. coincides with beginning of a gold rally. interesting
Not
test

BLOK outperforming SOXX. MSTR, IREN pos.
Not
test

recent strength in biotech. LABU
Not
test

A: Insurance ETF log trend, rallying -> weak UNH, the top for UNH.
B: log trend break. dead sector. imo. second fall for UNH.
Not
test

energy had a strong 2021-2023
Not
test

break of the NVDA log trend. -- early indicator for market top.
this is why I love log trends. there's zero bias
Not
test

and probably worth to keep eye on NVDA in next 2-3 months? what would look like accumulation, could mean beginning of a crash.
Not
test

SOXX sector lagging behind in late november - probably an early warning sign for stocks (ie the market top?). Maybe that's why such quite stock market in december.

test

BTC break of a strong trend.

breaking another one would probably mean de-facto stock market top? this week, depending on Wednesdays NVDA earnings- and price action.
100% volatile week imo.
with an uptrendy VIX.
Not
test

BTC on log trend is at a crucial level.
Weekly charts tell the story. It looks weak. but new upside candle means reversal.

test

on a monthly chart, even if it rallies, it creates a HNS pattern. which means... volatile months ahead:)

w/ odds 50-50 for ABC correction. 80K BTC.

during "do not touch" period it means lower demand. Lower demand, higher supply - downside pressure, risk.
Besides, critical NVDA earnings in Wednesday. could save btc. imo.
Not
test

3-day innertia. often coincides with bottoms? Or shows the S/D strength basically?

Confluence is when things fit the 10/20/50. Pattern break-outs?

Confluence coincides with break outs.
Not
test

same concept with gold.

//Psychologically, hard to switch between euphoria (easy %) and "range bound market". Statistically -- everything that flies -- reverts to mean or average?

Based on Qullamaggie, in this chart. There are two openings?:
-tight range break outs.
-Strong bull markets? ie bull phase.
Not
Macro.

Thinking in systems.

Things move, when it make sense to move.
It make sense why bitcoin rallied in 2023-2025. Or why gold moved. It wasnt the charts.

You think in systems.
When you over-estimate charts, it makes you lose sense of bigger picture.

//When Yields start droping, it cause high demand for small caps, risk on, momentum. It cause the innertia or 1st wave of demand. After some while, there's continuation of 2nd wave... people dont question the cause.
When you think in system, it makes sense why bitcoin topped now based on bigger liquidity cycle.

ie --- where does it make sense for the rich people to allocate capital?
Does anything change in the macro picture? what's different? what changes?

During Euphoria or easy % phase, people stop questioning. because they dont need to.
Not
test

ive noticed how typically for "most people". Maybe even professionals. Everyone take risk when there's a clear bull market. And they are passive and want to wait during corrections.

You have been told that it's retail investors that buy the last. but it doesnt work in practice.

Markets move based on positioning.
Not
even for every small correction. Typical attitude is to be passive and take risk during break outs, safe places. That has least return.
Not
test

Measuring S/D strength, using simple 50/200 crossover rule.
Where the exhaust and safe positions would be; VS where the price was. meaning, market showed strength before it was safe.
Not
test

Gold miner/SPX, 200dma sloping up.
Not
big money

Big money (or pareto 20/80) is made from few spots, that are only seen longterm or using an outside view.
Many pockets have potential to earn. But big money is scarce. (!) Looking at relative basis.

Not
test

what's interesting. These "key" spots would be once in every year. more or less. Typical crowd consensus was risk aversion, neither greed or fear (no crazy risk taking).

If you do look at these spots near term, you wouldnt spot a difference.

If you study these spots long term -- it's where the big money is. (!)

Not
add the 20/80 influential events, that push the markets.

ie 10/20/50 downside momentum + NVDA earnings ---> predictable weakness?
Not
Bottom FOMO: Element of fear, when you know everyone knows it's the bottom. even if there's slight delay.
Not
test

best time to be bullish momentum? buying longterm.

test

I wonder if it rather make sense to be aggressive here, than on top flying stocks.
because here there's less resistance.

than top names like HOOD. etc. that has grown so much.
test

if you use ponzi analogy. there's more weight applied the higher it goes. ie more resistance. in spite of best % in short term.
I feel like psychology applies there? people that wouldnt sold on the top, might start selling heavily next time it is near ATH.. and many momentum stocks look a like? like PLTR.
Not
test

best time for momentum.
tuff markets?

test

and a V-shape bounce.

because of psychology (like stage cycle).

test

CLSK.

u want to be on things when things go easy. with ease.
Not
test

btc to prove a point.
Not
maybe that do be the problem with chasing sector leaders or top stocks, ignoring the longterm context?
Not
test

so this is different right?

Feragatname

Bilgiler ve yayınlar, TradingView tarafından sağlanan veya onaylanan finansal, yatırım, alım satım veya diğer türden tavsiye veya öneriler anlamına gelmez ve teşkil etmez. Kullanım Koşulları bölümünde daha fazlasını okuyun.